Funny how you refer to the NY Times as an authority,
and then blame the administration for the leak.
The White House gave that info to the NY Times in deep
background just to give it validity. The NY Times
published the name knowing damn well they shouldn't
have. The Bush admin messed up big time trusting them.
That�s right, I think Bush screwed up big time!
-sm
--- Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because many consider the NYTimes and the Post as
> authorities, that is why. The
> main statement being that they were duped by
> believing the Administration's
> rationale.
>
> I can appreciate the fact they are doing a
> re-assessment of reporting policies,
> and conspicuous by their absence are the right
> wingers, many of whom still think
> there are WMD in Iraq, and that Iraq was responsible
> for 9-11. Also they are
> not concerned that Afghanistan has taken a back seat
> to the Admin's prosecution
> of his "war," and leaking Pakistani Intelligence
> for political re-election
> purposes.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sam Morris
>
>
> Why would anyone read that right-wing rag anyway?
>
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
