This is a little leap from just a literal reading.  However, since you know
the people who wrote this, you are in a much better position then I to
understand what they were trying to say. However, if they pray at the Church
of Rush, then they are in deep intellectual do-do.  Sort of the crap in crap
out view.

I do believe that Sadaam supported terrorists as it suited him, which is how I
take this email.

I just remembered 1 Rush guy (my brother-in-law's father) and I am going to a
cubs game with the brother-in-law this weekend.  I'll ask him what his dad
thinks and get back to you.

Andy

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Kris Baca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 3:37 PM
  To: CF-Community
  Subject: Re: Right-wingers - Iraq & 9/11 Was ( Washington Post issues mea
culpa for prewar coverage)

  Hi Andy,

  I have many "rightwinger" relatives.  I am an independent (fiscally
  conservative, socially liberal), but I can tell you all of them
  believe that Iraq and 9/11 are connected.  They listen to Rush every
  day and watch O'Reilly every night.  That's where they got that idea.

  Here's a quote from an email:

  "I cannot believe you think Bush created a division in the US and
  worldwide when he asked the United Nations and other countries to
  enforce the UN agreements with Iraq.  We (United States) will not
  stand around waiting to be attacked again.  We are proactive.  If the
  rest of the countries to not want to come along well, so be it.. They
  will indirectly benefit from the work we are doing -- stopping the
  money supply, arresting the terrorists.  The world will be better off
  but it will take time before the job is complete."

  So there you have it - a "rightwinger" who is connecting 9/11
  ("attacked again") with Iraq ("we are proactive").

  k

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Andy Ousterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to