answer to everything. I am just reporting to anyone who followed the
earlier discussion and has an open mind that I looked into the
supporting text and find it convincing. The Tampa police department,
for instance, has no agenda here :)
If you don't choose to believe it ::shrug:: fine.
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: house of bush, house of saud
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has been called lies :) by you, I believe. No
> doubt Rush said so.
> But when you go to this book and look at the
> footnotes, it looks like
> pretty solid journalism to me. I mean, who do you
> want to call a liar,
> Sam? Those wild-eyed radicals at the Tampa police
> department? The
> Massachussetts Port Authority?
You lost me here. We know they were evacuated, Richard
Clark told us so. You are trying to tie it to Bush
and that's the lie. Richard Clark said Moore knowingly
lied about that. The money also exists but has nothing
to do with either Bush. Again lies. There's nothing
here so let's move on :)
> I am currently referring to the book, not the movie.
> Though if the
> book is solid journalism....yeah, Moore does cite
> it. Maybe he didn't
> pull it out of thin air after all :)
You to funny.
-sm
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
