Yes, and then all NY and CA votes won't automatically
go to the Dems. Most of NY is Republican but NYC's
high population always renders those votes useless.

-sm

--- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I wish more states would do this.  If you think of
> all the states that
> won by just a few hundred votes last election, and
> regardless, all of
> the electoral votes went to 1 candidate.  To me that
> just doesn't
> reflect the will of the people.
>
> Marlon
>
>
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:04:37 -0400, Sandy Clark
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The newest battleground state is Colorado.  In
> another twist they have a
> > masure on the same ballot which would take effect
> immediately (if approved)
> > in which Colorado's electoral votes would be split
> up according to its
> > popular vote.
> >
> >
>
http://washingtontimes.com/national/20041007-014009-7753r.htm
> >
> > Sandy Clark
> > http://www.shayna.com <http://www.shayna.com/>
> > CF Pretty Accessible at http://www.shayna.com/blog
> > Now offering 4 days Hands on CSS training October
> 11-14th. Rockville, MD.
> > For more information go to:
> >
> http://www.teratech.com/training/oc_classes.cfm#css
> >
> >
>
<http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40>
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to