my take.
I do think Bush is overspending but I'm not sure if
it's needed. I'm sure there's wasteful spending by the
Bush admin but am unaware of what that is. I would
need to know more of what people consider waste in
spending by the current admin.
I do realize a lot of the spending is for homeland
security and new departments in the 9/11 panels
recommendations. This to me is a no choice spending.
The Iraq war is a different argument all together. I
think it was necessary but many on this list don't so
I'll leave that aside.
Looking at Reagan years people used to call it
Reaganomics as if that were a bad word. In reality it
proved that lowering taxes boosted the economy.
Bush tried the same thing and it's working again.
So, I think raising taxes before a full recovery would
undo these gains.
-sm
--- Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I guess the real question is: Is it worse to "tax
> and spend" or just
> "spend"? What do you think, Sam? Regardless of
> who's doing it - either
> Kerry, Bush or anybody else?
>
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
