I could care less where each state would go.  I just want the people's
choice to be reflected in the election.

Marlon

On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 13:27:11 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, and then all NY and CA votes won't automatically
> go to the Dems. Most of NY is Republican but NYC's
> high population always renders those votes useless.
>
> -sm
>
>
> --- Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I wish more states would do this.  If you think of
> > all the states that
> > won by just a few hundred votes last election, and
> > regardless, all of
> > the electoral votes went to 1 candidate.  To me that
> > just doesn't
> > reflect the will of the people.
> >
> > Marlon
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:04:37 -0400, Sandy Clark
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The newest battleground state is Colorado.  In
> > another twist they have a
> > > masure on the same ballot which would take effect
> > immediately (if approved)
> > > in which Colorado's electoral votes would be split
> > up according to its
> > > popular vote.
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://washingtontimes.com/national/20041007-014009-7753r.htm
> > >
> > > Sandy Clark
> > > http://www.shayna.com <http://www.shayna.com/>
> > > CF Pretty Accessible at http://www.shayna.com/blog
> > > Now offering 4 days Hands on CSS training October
> > 11-14th. Rockville, MD.
> > > For more information go to:
> > >
> > http://www.teratech.com/training/oc_classes.cfm#css
> > >
> > >
> >
> <http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to