Now I believe what Clinton was doing was working. He had a mediator for the peace talks. It didn't stop the violence but it slowed it down a lot and showed the two sides they might be able to live together. It was working for Arafat because he was making millions. Unfortunately the Clinton term was coming to an end with no deal signed. That's when he forced their hands so he could win the Nobel Piece Prize.
Since Arafat had no intention of piece, once all his demands were met he had no choice but to sign. He instead chose the intifada. I truly think Arafat had no intentions of peace but if semi-peace had lasted a few more years maybe more of the Palestinians would've ignored Arafat. --- Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only thing that will stop this problem is to > nurture the feelings > both sides have on creating peace. If you can grow > that, while > politically isolating the opponents of peace, peace > will succeed. > > This same model was used by Mr. Clinton in Northern > Ireland and by Mr. > Powell with Iraq (vis a vis 1441). > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=38 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:132373 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
