> Sam wrote: > The glass is half full! > but why focus on the tiny amount that slipped through the cracks?
As I've said before the reason to focus on this "tiny amount" is because the Pentagon cannot account for what amount if any existed at an IAEA tagged site. It is not the amount, it is the policy. If the Pentagon, and therefore President Bush, were competently pursuing this war, the Pentagon would be able to tell us exactly what happened at that site: when the troops got there, how much HE was there, what amount if any was looted, etc. The fact that they can't points to a policy problem - a problem with the Pentagon leadership. It says that the Pentagon was not actively tracking sites such as this and therefore any explosives that have been captured have been by luck rather than by planning. It is evidence of poor planning, too few troops to do the job properly, and almost no plan to manage the country after the invasion. That's why it's important. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| The annual ColdFusion User Conference is being held Sat 6/26 - Sun 6/27/04 8am-5pm in the Washington DC Area. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=44 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:133751 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
