Michael Dinowitz wrote: > And how many of us swing around with a young boy in tights? > >
He is the inner side to us all =P. Personally, I always thought Robin was Batman's out. Remember this revenge thing is Bruce's play. Batman is a tool to achieve that revenge. I always thought Batman let Robin tag along so he would have an excuse to quit. "I put the boy in too much danager." etc etc. I guess I was wrong about that though. But as I think about it a little more, I think that was the way DC should have persued it. The forward in Death in Family exlores this idea that Robin is bright colored as a contrast to Batman. It pushes the idea Robin would draw some fire. I don't believe that theory. What I do think is that Robin would draw attention to Batman himself. That his driving ego, Bruce, would be exposed and he can quit his crime fighting life. PS Jim, you probably have it already, but I suggest you read "Just A Pilgrim". I think it's another Enis production. -- 2004 - The year $184M couldn't buy a pennant. Ron Artest: Extremely flawed, very accidental, semi-martyr ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics http://www.cfdynamics.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:140885 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
