I probably would have used the same adjective myself. Whenever I see a large 
group of frothing maniacs protesting on the Boston Common or along Winter 
Street, I walk well around them. It doesn't matter the cause (pro abortion/anti 
abortion, pro gay marriage/anti gay marriage, pro fur/anti fur), mobs do not 
excite me. They frighten me.

Do they have the right to protest? Yes. They may even have an obligation to 
protest. But I don't have to condone it. I don't have to participate. And using 
my free speech rights, I am allowed, nay required (due to my own twisted 
ethics), to mock them to my hearts content.

I called a long line outside of Q'Doba yesterday "insane" yesterday. Did I 
really think they were "insane"? No. But it is a good description of a hundred 
people standing outside freezing in line for Mexican fast food. The people I 
was walking with all agreed, so we went to Quizno's. (What is with all these 
Q-based fast food resteraunts lately?)



Jerry Johnson
Web Developer
Dolan Media Company

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/11/05 10:41AM >>>
The real problem here this is that somebody called a group of protesters
"insane" for standing up against things they believe are wrong, as if it was
wrong to fight for your beliefs.



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:142051
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to