Yves Arsenault wrote: > Not because they *must* Jochem. You were the one using that word.
> Because in reality, they (the relations) already *are*. > I would also have to say, that for many people, "getting married" > means much more than 2 people together.... it also caries a > pro-creative element. > But for many people and in fact much of the world, it also caries that > old biological element. So because of the way many people *perceive* the relations in the light of an 'old biological element', they *are* different? This makes me curious. When (not if, when) technology has advanced and it becomes possible for lesbian couples to have daughters that are their true biological children, in which category would they fall? Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:148255 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
