Jim. According to many, many, many people who I've heard, seen known...
When they spoke of marriage, it was spoke of in this manner. Get married, family, etc.... the sexual function of marriage was an unavoidable perception of what marriage was. You are a bit off track with diabeties. Millions of people believe that marriage indeed has some relation to this biological function. While, I've only heard of you who brought up a diabetic issue. It is a bit off subject, for the sake of your argument. Yves On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:16:12 -0500, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Yves Arsenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 3:05 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Gay Marriage( Was: Re: Activist Judges) > > > > THen you just don't marry a diabetic if you don't want to. > > So choosing who you marry may or may not come down to a simple biological > fact? > > And yet if that fact is diabetes then marriage is "normal" but if that fact > is homosexuality then the marriage is "different"? > > It doesn't seem to make much sense to me. > > > Biology is what it is. > > So homosexuality is not a biological drive? Many would argue (and most > homosexuals) that it is just as biological as diabetes. > > My point is that "marriage" offers socio-economic benefits to participants > and some people are being prevented from accessing those benefits despite > meeting all of the requirements for those benefits. > > Jim Davis > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:148365 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
