negative. But it's not my criterion, it's yours. Except that you don't mind citing a lawyer's medical opinion when it "fits you view of the case," again your term not mine.
The people who wrote those journal articles are at least physicians, no? Definitely highly trained? Personally I think that you can approach this case on a number of levels -- legal, medical, ethical, emotional, and maybe some more that don't come to mind right now. A lot of the headbutting going on, imho, is a result of people not defining their frame of reference. Gruss for example is stuck on law. You *were* doing science; right now I am not sure. Sam I think is talking ethics. Dana On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:30:01 -0600, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dana wrote: > > but is he a trained neurologist, Larry? > > > > Are you? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151342 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
