> Dana wrote: > I'm sorry, but I have already spent way too much time on this, and I > don't think you're going to change your mind. I'm not, because I am > right :P >
You may be, but I can't tell because your argument is a moving target. You said it best, either you believe Mr. Schiavo or not. If not, then show why you don't believe him and not with a bunch of, "well I would of done it this way" facts like, "he should've visited more." What that really means is, "I would've visited more." Move into a productive argument. For example, what was his motive? All you've said there is, "to control her" That's groundless as there's not a shred of evidence to support it. Find a useful theory on motive and then show how over 15 years this explains the facts. For example, how does your control theory explain the 2 years he flew her around the country while living with her parents? It doesn't. You need a theoretical framework that supports the facts and you don't have one. I do. That's where we disagree. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:153293 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
