> S. Isaac Dealey wrote: >> >> I imagine it's a lot easier to rattle off the numbers >> when he's got >> them either filed or bookmarked by category and date...
> No. The only thing I have locally is the SQL standard. For > the rest I have Google. >> but I have a hard time >> understanding how anyone has the simple time to _read_ >> them in the >> first place. > I'm a very fast reader. And I find it much easier to > remember something that I have read as something that I > have heard. And I don't remember everything, just enough > to Google it efficiently :) To these I say "wow". >> The language is so obfuscated (I'm convinced in many >> cases / ways intentionally so) that I could make a >> full-time job of >> just reading them. I swear if they can use 5 concise >> words to describe >> something with no ambiguity, they'll use 50. > Not at all. I am following the IETF RADEXT mailinglist > dealing with extensions to the RADIUS protocol and the one > thing that is foremost on everybodies mind is avoiding > ambiguity. It may seem that many RFCs are intentionally > obfuscated but they really are not. Every word is there > for a reason. To this I say "feh". s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080 new epoch : isn't it time for a change? add features without fixtures with the onTap open source framework http://www.fusiontap.com http://www.sys-con.com/author/?id=4806 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Homesite Plus with Dreamweaver from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=55 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:157597 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
