I spent a year working with the RJ Reynolds papers once. Early
database project for the smoking and health lawsuits. The reason
secondary smoke is more dangerous than inhaled smok is that it does
not go through a filter before entering the lungs.

Dana

On 6/9/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, your opinion and science don't exactly agree. Secondary smoke is a
> problem, it is dangerous. And some people believe that working in a very
> smoky bar is actually worse than smoking your self. I don't agree with that,
> but some thing it is true.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Protect Your PC from viruses, hackers, spam and more. Buy PC-cillin with Easy 
Installation & Support 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=61

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:160206
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to