Just a question, not being a smartass, but if the smoke was filtered already by the person smoking the cigarette, then isn't it already filtered?
Dana wrote: > I spent a year working with the RJ Reynolds papers once. Early > database project for the smoking and health lawsuits. The reason > secondary smoke is more dangerous than inhaled smok is that it does > not go through a filter before entering the lungs. > > Dana > > On 6/9/05, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Well, your opinion and science don't exactly agree. Secondary smoke is a >>problem, it is dangerous. And some people believe that working in a very >>smoky bar is actually worse than smoking your self. I don't agree with that, >>but some thing it is true. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:160210 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
