Are these the same "Americans" that voted Bush in office - twice? :)
I don't want the government involved in any way, shape or form to be involved with the Internet. If "Americans" are worried about the content that their children are seeing, then they should pressure companies like AOL to come up with ways of filtering their content (which is already happening). Let the rest of us be, it is very much a matter of free speech, and you know once the government gets involved, it becomes a moral issue that we'll throw millions of dollars at, never fix correctly, and the debate will rage on forever. Really, why should I have to suffer because John Q. Public's daughter stumbled upon MILFhunter.com? If you think about it in a way that makes people responsible for the upbringing of their own children, it is a great business opportunity for AOL/Earthlink, etc! Capitalism at it's finest! :) Ray Kevin Graeme wrote: > This actually came up on the news today. In some report/survey > Americans seem to feel that the government needs to play more of a > role in making the internet "more secure and safe". That was clarified > as less spam and virii and such but I immediately thought of the > sanitation of content for the sake of children. > > On 6/15/05, Dawson, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I think legislation should be created to require ISPs to look for this >>activity and block computers on their network. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Stay Ahead of Hackers - Download ZoneAlarm Pro http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=65 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:160931 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
