Does anyone really think that the government has the ability to make the internet "safe and secure"? All the best programmers in the world wouldn't be able to get through the red tape and legislation that this "problem" would create.
Besides that, I am VERY leery of what the government deems to be "safe and secure" content. Visions of the Great Firewall China running through my head.... Dawson, Michael wrote: > I also read an article about this in a magazine recently. I would vote > for it. > > M!ke > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 12:42 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Bayesian Filters and Dumb Zombie Owners > > This actually came up on the news today. In some report/survey Americans > seem to feel that the government needs to play more of a role in making > the internet "more secure and safe". That was clarified as less spam and > virii and such but I immediately thought of the sanitation of content > for the sake of children. > > On 6/15/05, Dawson, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I think legislation should be created to require ISPs to look for this > > >>activity and block computers on their network. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Now there’s a better way to fax. eFax makes it possible to use your existing email account to send and receive faxes. Try eFax free. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=63 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:160940 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
