> Matthew wrote: > Let's answer Gruss' points > > 2.) Mr. Bush could easily solve this matter by > > Stop whining about spin. It's typical politics and I'm not any more > offended by this than I am about Clinton lying to us about Monica, if in > fact it was a legal manuever. >
I think asking the federal gov't to be honest and truthful with the American public goes beyond "whining"; especially since this president specifically claimed he would be. Violating the public trust from the podium of the Whitehouse is a BIG deal, IMO. > > > 3.) The Whitehouse spokesperson lied to the US public or was lied to. > > Lying to the public is not against the law. I can't help that. Lying on the > stand is. > See response above. If you're ok with it, then you are. I expect more. > > > 4.) It is not the job of Mr. Rove to comment, or leak, information > > That's a silly remark. That's a silly response. The fact that leaks happen is true - do you approve of them? I don't. If I hire a guy to run my security I don't expect him to feel free to talk to the press about anything he wishes. This is the reason for the confidentiality agreement. I don't like it when the President's policy advisor starts moonlighting as the Whitehouse spokesperson. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:165304 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
