Yeah, but life sucks, doesn't it?  I do in fact think that people should get
money back for many things that they don't use.  Charlotte recently built a
big ol' stadium for the basketball team.  I'll never see the inside of it, I
think it's a waste of money and I resent my tax dollars being spent on it.
But it's not my call to decide this.  On the other hand, I know that
education is incredibly important, and I think money should be given back to
a parent to help educate the child.  Now whose business is it how the parent
decides how to educate the child?  Now it's another government thing becaseu
they gave someone a few bucks?  Yes, great idea, let's put George in the
classroom to tell our children how to say Nukular. Brilliant.

The money that the government gets is all our money to begin with.  When the
government decides to actually do the right thing for once and let us decide
how to educate our children, you get up in arms about it.  There's no
fairness here - fairness is not a Constitutional right.   It's unfair that I
pay for schools yet don't have children.  Yet I do it, it's the right thing
to do.  Anytime a child gets a better education it's the right thing to do.

- Matt Small


-----Original Message-----
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:42 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs

I guess we all need to start getting checks back from the government, if

A.) We don't use all of the highways in our area.  We should only have
to pay for the ones we use right.
B.) Our party isn't in the majority in the house and senate, because
if they're not representing me, why should I pay their salary.
C.) The military is spending money on something we don't support.  Say
Iraq for example.

The list goes on and on.

Taxes are not "your" money anymore once their collected.  Vouchers are
a political ploy to make people think that politicians are "doing"
something.



On 10/27/05, Matthew Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think this is a good idea.  Federal money should not dictate what
> goes on at a private school,otherwise it's no longer a private school.
> Federal vouchers are nothing more than giving back to a person what the
> government took away to begin with, just they help defray the cost of the
> parent who wants to send the child to a school of the parent's choice,
> because the public school is not the parent's first choice.  In other
words,
> it's not federal money, it's private money.
>
> To say otherwise is like saying that the government can tell Sony what
kind
> of music to sell because you spent your tax refund on an Eminem album.
>
>
> - Matt Small
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:04 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Private High School orders students to take down blogs
>
> > Jerry wrote:
> > No Gruss, you are wrong.
> > If private schools do not have to accept people on basis of race,
> > religion, test scores, IQ, money, athletic ability or special needs,
> > then they have a completely unfair advantage in every way.
>
> I see your point.  The competition can be within a group of schools
> that would agree to be "public" schools, while private schools would
> remain selective and ineligible for vouchers.  Is that the idea?
>
> (Let's characterize this as "Jerry is right" rather than "Gruss is wrong"
:)
>
>
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:178572
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to