On 11/9/05, Ben Doom wrote: > > I don't understand what you're getting at.
That's ok most people don't :) I'll try again. The way our society understands marriage is between a man and a women. That's the way nature intended. If a couple can't have a child and adopt of use a test tube they're still doing what nature intended, they just have a handicap or a good heart. What I'm hearing now is people wanting it to be accepted that nature intended gay marriage just as readily as heterosexual. I'm just saying it's acceptable but not what nature intended. You know the whole evolution thing. > > You make the assumption that I want to change morals. My morals tell me > that treating someone as though they were a lesser person just because > they're gay is wrong. Not giving them the label marriage is not treating them lesser, it's just noticing a difference. Think Miss, Mrs., Ms and Mr. Why are we not equal? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:180698 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
