Geez, it seems that we're experts on this here? ummmmmm. That's great. Between the lady who slapped a restraining order on David Letterman and the UFO murder case, we're doing great in the area of public relations. I'm surprised that anyone takes the spaceport seriously.
On 12/28/05, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To answer the insipid question of whether animal sexual abuse hurts the > animal: > > "Yes. Sexual molestation of animals by humans may physically injure or > kill the animal victim. Cases of dogs with severe rectal tearing from > anal sexual contact; cats killed by penetration by a human male; > chickens decapitated to increase the abuser's sexual pleasure; animals > beaten stabbed, or mutilated during or after sexual contact; and > animals crushed for sexual gratification have been reported. Many > animals are physically restrained during the abuse. > > Not all cases of animal sexual abuse will involve physical injury to > the animal, but all sexual molestation of an animal by a human is > abuse. In his 1993 article, Dr. Frank Ascione stated that "bestiality > may be considered cruel even in cases when physical harm to an animal > does not occur (this is similar to the case of adult sexual activity > with a child > where consent is presumed to be impossible)". This is because animals > are unable to be fully informed, communicate consent, or to speak out > about their abuse. In a 1997 article, Piers Beirne, Professor of > Criminology at the University of Southern Maine, points out that "for > genuine consent to sexual relations to be present...both participants > must be conscious, fully informed and positive in their desires. > > Bestiality is by nature sexual coercion because animals are incapable > of genuinely saying 'yes' or 'no' to humans in forms we can readily > understand". In human-animal relationships, the human has power and > control over the animal, often in all aspects of the animal's care and > well-being. Thus, a sexual Arelationship between human and animal > cannot be considered consensual. " > > http://www.nmanimalcontrol.com/aco_fo/sex_abuse/ > > It's utterly deplorable that a supposedly reasoning human being cannot > rationalise that having sex with a dog can cause injury to the dog, > not going into just how utterly sick such an act is and what it > implies about the state of mind of the individual performing the act. > > It wasn't really worth replying to. > good grief. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189993 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
