I'm dropping it, plain and simple.

Chesty Puller wrote:
> Sorry that, should have read: Not my fault I asked a question about it if 
> you don't want to talk about it.
> 
> - Matt
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chesty Puller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 4:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Maybe one day we'll allow them to get married.
> 
> 
> 
>>Does one need to know why the sky is blue?  No, but research has been done
>>and an answer was determined.  Not my fault I asked a question about it.
>>
>>- Matt
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: "Ray Champagne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]>
>>Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 4:19 PM
>>Subject: Re: Maybe one day we'll allow them to get married.
>>
>>
>>
>>>You said it, dead horse.  I'm willing to forgo a long arduous agrument
>>>where we'll both end up with the same views we came in with.  I've got a
>>>wife who'll gladly take up those kinds of discussions with me anytime. 
>>>:)
>>>
>>>I'd be surprised if Gel answered your questions about research.  Does
>>>one really need research to tell them that animal sex probably hurts the
>>>animal?
>>>
>>>Chesty Puller wrote:
>>>
>>>>Actually, I let the comment drop because I didn't feel like getting into
>>>>that argument. There was a jibe in the initial title because the article
>>>>itself delves into that argument and that fact is that I myself have
>>>>actually predicted on this list that such utter nonsense would come to
>>>>play
>>>>via the argument for homosexual marriage.  And here I am, right about 
>>>>it.
>>>>
>>>>What I really find interesting is that your response to zoophilia is
>>>>about
>>>>the same as many people's towards homosexuality.  Logic aside, there are
>>>>many people who just don't think that homosexual marriage makes any 
>>>>sense
>>>>with the same emotion that you make clear in your post.  However, that's
>>>>as
>>>>far as I feel like discussing this issue because it's a dead horse.  I
>>>>will
>>>>decline to answer your direct question because my own feelings on any
>>>>marriage outside of male-female relationships are probably well-known or
>>>>are
>>>>at least inferred with the responses that I've posted today to certain
>>>>threads.
>>>>
>>>>However, there was no question about the homosexual marraige in the
>>>>response
>>>>to Gel.  He insinuated that he knew of research that indicated that this
>>>>kind of relationship was actually harmful to the animal.  That's what
>>>>really
>>>>interests me - the fact that this research exists and the actual 
>>>>outcome.
>>>>Is it harmful because the animal was physically hurt?  Is it emotional
>>>>hurt?
>>>>Where in the world did they find test subjects?  Why does Gel know about
>>>>it?
>>>>
>>>>Those are the hard-hitting questions I have for Gel.
>>>>
>>>>- Matt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>From: "Ray Champagne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]>
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 3:47 PM
>>>>Subject: Re: Maybe one day we'll allow them to get married.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>OK, fair enough, but I still think you're implying something ridiculous
>>>>>here...I noticed you didn't respond to the marriage comment, either.  I
>>>>>mean, you put a reference to marriage in the subject, then played th
>>>>>passive-aggressive card (or actually, in this case it would be
>>>>>aggressive-passive), saying "I didn't make any statements".  But that's
>>>>>not really what I wanted to know about anyways.
>>>>>
>>>>>To put it bluntly: Are you saying that if we let two Homosexshuls get
>>>>>married, we should let Fifi and her owner get married, too?
>>>>>
>>>>>Chesty Puller wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I didn't make any statements, I asked why was it harmful to the dog. It
>>>>>>probably is harmful, but I don't know why it is, and I was asking Gel 
>>>>>>to
>>>>>>explain why it was since he seemed to know about the research.
>>>>>>Sometimes
>>>>>>questions are meant to be answered as they are asked.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>- Matt
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>>From: "Ray Champagne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:52 PM
>>>>>>Subject: Re: Maybe one day we'll allow them to get married.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Dude, are you serious?  Are you asking why sexually assaulting a dog 
>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>harmful to the dog?  Would you like it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And I'm sorry, but if you're fishing at comparing homosexual marriage
>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>man and dog, it just is not comparable.  One's the conscious decision
>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>two willing persons, the other is abuse of an animal, plain and 
>>>>>>>simple.
>>>>>>>They just aren't the same, and I get tried of hearing that argument...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Chesty Puller wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Does this research exist? How would you get it?  Why is it harmful?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>- Matt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>>>>>From: "Vivec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>>>>To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:40 PM
>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: Maybe one day we'll allow them to get married.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Yup.
>>>>>>>>>Soon people will be marrying their dogs.
>>>>>>>>>*smirk*
>>>>>>>>>Why should ANYTHING be seen as immoral after all?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>The fact that the writer didn't touch on the research which says 
>>>>>>>>>such
>>>>>>>>>interactions are harmful to the animal and should fall under Cruelty
>>>>>>>>>to animals is interesting.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On 12/28/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>http://www.slate.com/id/103801/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>- Matt
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:189996
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to