Wait... because the information is worthless in prosecution, they way I understand it the FISA court is never, not available.
sas Scott A. Stewart ColdFusion Developer GNSI 11820 Parklawn Dr Rockville, MD 20852 (301) 770-9610 -----Original Message----- From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 3:33 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Sen. Kennedy agrees agree. but what if the warrant court is unvailable and there is a hot tip to tap? tap it or wait? tw On 1/26/06, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tap all the phones you want, just make sure you have your warrants in order. > Do what ever it takes just do it with in the law. > > End of story.. > > Scott A. Stewart > ColdFusion Developer > > GNSI > 11820 Parklawn Dr > Rockville, MD 20852 > (301) 770-9610 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 3:24 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Sen. Kennedy agrees > > you know its all worst case scenario really, but for fucks sake, if > their wiretapping > prevents even 1 innocent american life... isnt it worth it? > > my grandmother? your little sister? walking in a mall in dc, and some > fucking towel > decides to blow up something, and he was funded by some other fucking > idiot towel > in yemen, and we didnt intercept the call because we didnt want to > tread on this notion > of privacy. im sorry, but ill go with interception every day of the week. > > tw > > On 1/26/06, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is one of those "fine line" issues. The NSA and CIA basically have > > carte-blanche about who they tap/spy on provided they are non-US > > citizens residing outside the US. Which has been interpreted to mean > > they can tap incoming calls to the US. > > > > What they were not allowed to do, and they have been doing, is tapping > > calls made in the US without a warrant. > > > > The first scenario I disagree with as well, but it's been upheld by the > > courts. The second scenario bypasses the courts altogether. > > > > --Ben > > > > Scott Stewart wrote: > > > I guess the major disconnect I have with this is that the NSA has been > doing > > > this lawfully for decades, since their inception in 1949. Why start > skirting > > > the law now. > > > > > > Because 8 got dumped? Get a better lawyer. This smacks of a HUGE ego or > > > something far more sinister. > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:194594 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
