Context. The government run newspaper of Iran is seeking submissions of cartoons to showcase rejection of the Holocaust, not 'about'. They were specific pictures designed specifically to attack. The context of the Danish pictures were an article about pictures of Muhammad, not a specific attack. But lets go back to the argument that has been made here by more than one person. Two wrongs don't make a right. Do they have the right to publish cartoons designed to attack Jews? Sure, They do it all the time. Will Israel or anyone else blow up their embassies because of it or riot? No. Will they protest? Sure. Will people here condemn the pictures with the same strength that they have the Danish ones? We'll see.
>A Muslim newspaper says it is seeking submissions of cartoons about the >Holocaust. Is that ok? > >>"Jyllands-Posten rejected several cartoons satirizing the resurrection >>of Jesus, saying they were not funny and would "provoke an outcry." >> >>On 2/8/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> But I think, the way the facts stand, you really have apples and >>> oranges. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:196279 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
