> JJ wrote:
> It takes an observed event (we will leave aside the credibility of the
> event) and tries to find an explanation. It then tries to predict
> future behaviors and repeat it.
>

Yeah, this is interesting and I hadn't thought about it before.  In MN
on lakes that have barely frozen and then melted, or on lakes that are
almost melted in the spring, you can mimic the "walking on water"
trick.  I used to do it all of the time as a kid.

If you're more than 10 feet from shore, or if you're on a side of the
lake with a lot of flow, the lake looks totally like water.  In
certain spots, however, there is standing water covering ice - usually
about ankle deep.  Thus you can't see the ice, but you can walk on it.

>From any more than a few feet, it could appear like you're walking on
water - it splashes and everything.  Like I said, we used to do it all
of the time.

Interesting ...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203158
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to