Sure is, as is the constitution or any other crap someone wants to try and
make a part of this.

The only thing that matters is UCMJ, and I'm sure he will be found guilty
under UCMJ.

Hope he enjoys Leavenworth.  I hear that they really love officers there.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chesty Puller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 9:04 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Tim, what's your thoughts on this?
> 
> International law is completely irrelevant.
> 
> - Matt
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gruss Gott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 8:52 AM
> Subject: Re: Tim, what's your thoughts on this?
> 
> 
> >> Ray wrote:
> >> How are the orders illegal exactly?
> >
> > Doesn't international law prohibit an attack or invasion of another
> > country without provocation?
> >
> > So in this case you could argue that while we did have provocation
> > (WMD), we were wrong and therefore shouldn't be there any more.  The
> > fact that we are makes it an illegal occupation.
> >
> > The counter argument is that we're "guests" of the current Iraqi
> > government, however that government was only put in place a few weeks
> > ago and still isn't solid.  Therefore the first argument, while weak,
> > would still hold.
> >
> >
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:210101
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to