Actually - we were talking about what exactly it takes to make life difficult for someone who was a pubic servant, just because they don't happen to follow your script, whether this be out of integrity or misreading the cues.
Let me tell you. It takes the kind of mind that can't debate without making wild accusations of partisanship, or casting aspersions on the integrity of others. We're talking about a mind that sees nothing wrong with gay-bashing to distract the ignorant from the violations of human rights that are being carried out in their name. We're talking about people who would declare war for personal gain and then throw a hissy fit when someone correctly points out that they have misled the people they are supposed to represent. It's the kind of mind that would call someone biased when it can't even be bothered to find out what's really happening, Sam, you know what I am saying here? You ever hear the term displacement? I have often wondered about you. I can't really tell if you believe this stuff you spew because you keep feeding it into your mind, or if this is a big trollish role you play because you don't have any other life. Hard to say. But I am thinking that maybe Jerry has the right idea after all. > Don't you worry about me, we're talking about you right now. > > > I don't care *who* is in power, it is the responsibility of the > Fourth Estate to report on their activities, especially those which > are dangerous to the republic or to the constitution. > > What dangers? Looking through financial records or re-naming a CIA > analyst? > > > I'm no blind partisan. When corruption is exposed in our > (Democtratic) state governement I applaud just as hard, so stuff that > in your Rush Limbaugh and smoke it. > > I never heard you condemn a democrat yet you go on and on about the > culture of corruption if it involves GOPers. > > > Probably not, but that's a guess. More likely they found out about > it unofficially from A then called B to get a comment, and B would > only do so "not for attribution." In context, means the second source > is quite likely the current press spokesperson. > > Probably, guess and quite likely? > You're cherry picking what you want to believe. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211232 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
