On 7/14/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has to do with who is David and who is Goliath in the story I think.
I see, so if it's against the current Goliath admin it's a good thing. If it helps this Goliath admin in anyway it's a bad thing. > No, it's the New York TImes quoting unnamed officials who say it is working. > It's the New York Times giving the other side of the story. I know it's kind > of a foreign concept at this point.... Are these the same unnamed officials that gave them the story? Again if it's anti Bush admin, good, if it supports them bad. Even in the same article. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211201 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
