Aren't there two sides of a debate? I think you're point of view is
just as far to the left as you think mine is to the right.
Think about everything you've ever said about Bush, Rove or Rumesfeld
on this list. Based solely on your gut feeling. Now look at how you
ignore all the facts to defend Wilson. That's the person you just
described when you thought you were talking about me.
Your blind defense is government bad, little guy good. No matter what
the facts are.

As far as casting "aspersions on the integrity of others", aren't you
always the first to discredit something as a Rush Limbaugh thought?
Weekly standard or Washington Times is an automatic discredit. What's
the difference? If someone
is known to be biased and makes negative claims with out a backup
source aren't they considered to be just blowing hot air?

Gay bashing? War for personal gain?

That's far left rhetoric.


On 7/14/06, Dana Tierney wrote:
> Actually - we were talking about what exactly it takes to make life difficult 
> for someone who was a pubic servant, just because they don't happen to follow 
> your script, whether this be out of integrity or misreading the cues.
>
> Let me tell you. It takes the kind of mind that can't debate without making 
> wild accusations of partisanship, or casting aspersions on the integrity of 
> others. We're talking about a mind that sees nothing wrong with gay-bashing 
> to distract the ignorant from the violations of human rights that are being 
> carried out in their name. We're talking about people who would declare war 
> for personal gain and then throw a hissy fit when someone correctly points 
> out that they have misled the people they are supposed to represent.
>
> It's the kind of mind that would call someone biased when it can't even be 
> bothered to find out what's really happening, Sam, you know what I am saying 
> here? You ever hear the term displacement? I have often wondered about you. I 
> can't really tell if you believe this stuff you spew because you keep feeding 
> it into your mind, or if this is a big trollish role you play because you 
> don't have any other life. Hard to say.
>
> But I am thinking that maybe Jerry has the right idea after all.
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211235
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to