not calling everyone who disagrees with him a terrorist might be a start for Bush, at that.
On 8/21/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Great. > > Soros' idea is to pull out now, and try to avoid future attacks by > negotiating with terrorists. > > You agree with that? > > On 8/21/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Tired or no, he's exactly right. For some reason, as I've mentioned a > > zillion times, our military leaders continue to think that we can > > defeat terrorism with bombs. Na ga do it. > > > > The Bush policy of talk-to-nobody-and-bomb-stuff hasn't worked. > > Case-in-point: al-Zarqawi. Since the bad guy is dead we should be > > able to see a measurable decrease in attacks right? Wrong. Attacks > > on US troops are up 60% since his death. > > > > So the question is, but what metric are we measuring success? The > > ability of the enemy to coordinate attacks against us? If so, then > > we've got hard evidence that we're failing after 5 years. > > > > The data is in: The Bush Mideast policy, and policy on decreasing > > terrorism, is a total failure. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213761 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
