Show me where the Bush doctrine says bow to us or we'll kill you. That's what Iran's been saying in word and deed. I don't see us funding terrorists who kill innocents to get a message across. That alone is enough of a difference. My point was that these are the people Soros wants us to negotiate with. The people we've been trying to negotiate with for years and have been lied to time and again. Even today, they've shown that all the negotiations of the past are meaningless. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060821/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_nuclear
So the question was who are we negotiating with and what are their goals. What basis do we have for negotiations? They've said it bluntly and I have not seen Bush say it that way or even close. > And this is different than the Bush doctrine how exactly? > > On 8/21/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sure, lets negotiate. Here's how Iran wants negotiations to be held: >> "If you want to have good relations with the Iranian people in the >> future, >> you should acknowledge the right and the might of the Iranian people, and >> you should bow and surrender to the might of the Iranian people. If you >> do >> not accept this, the Iranian people will force you to bow and surrender." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213770 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
