Nope I am saying it's an ugly race all around. The Democrat (currently the 
state attorney-general) has made the race be about Haliburton. To the extent 
that she has been successful in this, you can see it as Bush being in trouble, 
see? Cause whatever else you want to say about Haliburton Heather, she is good 
at constituent services. She also votes a straight party line though, which she 
is denyng at the moment. 

Meanwhile in the best tradition of Republican campaigns, the incumbent is 
dragging in a corruption scandal involving the state treasurer, saying that 
Madrid should have prosecuted. Madrid's side of that is that nobody brough the 
issue to her ::shrug::

So Heather isn't saying Patricia is corrupt... she is saying that she ignored 
the fact that the treasurer was corrupt. That he was is not really indispute 
that as far as I can recall he has not yet been found guilty. Hung jury at the 
first trial, second still in progress. But my point is that this is not really 
a national issue unless Madrid was in fact implicated, in which case it would 
go to character. 

Ten words or less - that you can come this close to unseating a popular 
incumbent is a measure of voter discontent. That's my point.


>So the Democrat that's running for local office is running against Bush. Nice.
>The Republican is pointing out the Democrat is corrupt. You're saying:
>"what does that have to do with running against Bush?"
>
>:P
>
>On 10/24/06, Dana Tierney wrote:
>
>unrelated (or not depending on whome you believe) corruption scandal

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:218285
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to