I think that his remarks were poorly thought out and maybe he was targeting the president, but he totally missed. Even the original text that he was supposed to use was poorly though out and he just ad libbed on it.
>So Michael, you believe that his remarks _were_ directed at the troops >(who don't match the statement) instead of President Bush (who does >match the statement) > >On 11/5/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:219593 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
