Yes, it was poorly thought out, and mean.

(If it is true that Bush is an idiot, then it is mean. If Bush is not
an idiot, then it is mean to pretend to truly believe he is)/

He is a nerd. And his people have proven they are not the best in the business.

But _that_ fact is what the right should be harping on. Even if
delivered correctly, it was dumb. And untrue. And not funny. To
continue to insist that the words be taken and interpreted in the
worst light is dishonest.

Make fun of him, and point out that he is wrong, but don't lie about
what he meant.

On 11/5/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that his remarks were poorly thought out and maybe he was targeting 
> the president, but he totally missed. Even the original text that he was 
> supposed to use was poorly though out and he just ad libbed on it.
>
> >So Michael, you believe that his remarks _were_ directed at the troops
> >(who don't match the statement) instead of President Bush (who does
> >match the statement)
> >
> >On 11/5/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:219595
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to