> JJ wrote: > This is certainly going well. > You did a great job, Rummy. >
This is why it's so obvious that, no matter the troops nor commitment, we can't save Iraq unless they want to save themselves. And as long as we're there subsidizing the Iraqis they're not going to save themselves because that's hard dangerous work and they don't want to do it any more than we do. To me the analogy is an alcoholic. You can only do so much to help them before you cross the line on enabling. People, in general, don't do hard work when they don't absolutely have to. As long as the US is subsidizing Iraqi security, there's no reason they absolutely have too. And they can blame us for the failure. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:220612 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
