But, the city is the only entity to sue: The judge is pretty much protected from any civil suits. The individual police are almost completely protected from any civil suits. The jurors are almost completely protected from any civil suits.
He already promised not sue the state, so the entity responsible for the judge is safe. He already promised not sue the state, so the entity responsible for the jury is safe. So, the entity which has responsibility for the police, the DA, etc are the only potential responsible parties that can be sued. I think. The city today is the same entity as the city 20 years and 100 years ago, so that argument won't fly. On 1/25/07, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Partly my point, based on what I've been able to read without digging in > to > the case or old news clippings, this is a case where the jury convicted. > Wrongful Imprisonment implies that somebody is not given due process, > which > he was. > > > He was tried, convicted and sent to prison, this the imprisonment was not > wrongful, regrettable, but it was at no fault of the city today. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:225760 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
