I can see both arguments on most of those items listed however I'd like to add one to the list. Let's stop the speakers at commencement ceremonies from railing on and on about their political agendas.
The ceremony is supposed to be in honor of the students accomplishments not a soap box for the speaker to expound his or her political views for an hour. What about giving credit to the accomplishments of the students, and possibly the faculty. Gruss Gott wrote: > [In] Arizona, a Senate committee on Thursday approved a bill that has > infuriated faculty and student leaders. The bill, whose chief sponsor > is the Republican majority leader in the Senate, would ban professors > at public colleges and universities, while working, from: > > * Endorsing, supporting or opposing any candidate for local, state > or national office. > > * Endorsing, supporting or opposing any pending legislation, > regulation or rule under consideration by local, state or federal > agencies. > > * Endorsing, supporting or opposing any litigation in any court. > > *Advocating "one side of a social, political, or cultural issue > that is a matter of partisan controversy." > > * Hindering military recruiting on campus or endorsing the > activities of those who do. > > Under the legislation, the Arizona Board of Regents, which governs the > state's public universities, and the individual boards of community > colleges would be responsible for setting guidelines for the law and > for requiring all faculty members to participate in three hours of > training annually on their responsibilities under the law. > > Punishments could come in two forms. The governing boards' guidelines > would need to develop procedures, including suspensions and > terminations in some cases, according to the bill. In addition, the > state attorney general and county prosecutors could sue violators, and > state courts could impose fines of up to $500. The legislation would > bar colleges or their insurance policies from paying the fines money > would need to be paid directly by the professors found guilty. > > It is unclear whether the legislation has the backing to become law. > It was approved by the Senate Government Committee, on a 4-3 party > line vote, amid reports that the Education Committee wasn't prepared > to support the legislation. Given that the sponsor of the legislation, > Sen. Thayer Verschoor, is Republican majority leader, the legislation > is being taken as a real threat even by those who expect it to be > defeated at some point. > > "This is a censorship bill. We are obviously very opposed," said Reyes > Medrano Sr., president-elect of the Maricopa Community College > District Faculty Association and a business professor at Paradise > Valley Community College. > > "We can't see what this bill would accomplish," Medrano said. He added > that the group was stepping up lobbying efforts against the > legislation, and would consider court action if the bill becomes law. > "There is plenty to work with there," he said. > > Serena Unrein, executive director of the Arizona Students' > Association, said that the bill would prevent faculty members from > discussing many things that belong in the classroom. "There are so > many examples an economics professor couldn't talk about the > viability of privatizing Social Security. Any time that there are > efforts to restrict what college students are able to learn in the > classroom, we should take it seriously." > > The blog College Freedom has said the bill, if enacted, would be "the > worst legislative attack on academic freedom in the history of > American higher education." Even David Horowitz is opposed, saying > that the bill goes too far. He wrote in a statement that he has never > advocated legislative limits on what college faculty members may say > in class. > > In an interview on Friday, Verschoor defended his bill and pledged to > push it. "In our institutions of higher education, students should be > learning how to think, not what to think," he said. > > Verschoor said that there has been "a problem for quite a while" with > professors imposing politics on their students. He said that he hears > about this all the time and reads newspaper articles about it all the > time. > > Asked for specifics of the professorial behavior his bill would ban, > he cited two examples from his own education at Arizona State > University, from which he graduated in 1993. One time, he said, a > classroom where his course met was next door to a classroom used by a > women's studies class, which he entered one day by accident. "I came > in and all of the male students were dressed like women, and the > purpose was supposedly to see how a woman feels. I don't know how > being in a dress and high heels would help with that. That was > peculiar," he said. > > In another case, he said, his comments offended a professor's > political sensibilities. While Verschoor did not remember the > specifics of the political exchange or the class, he said that the > professor accused him of being "a political plant" and then said that > "plants are to be urinated on." > > Verschoor said that his intentions were not partisan and said that he > had heard that some professors had criticized Sen. John Kerry in > classes, and that he was offended by that as well as comments made > against President Bush. > > He also denied that the bill had anything to do with academic freedom. > "You can speak about any subject you want you just don't take a > position," he said. > > Scott Jaschik > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/ Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:228504 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
