ok listen.. I am not going to read that whole post or anymore of your posts.
If you dont know why it runs different on an Apple of a hacked half ass version on an extra pc then again you arent qualified to argue this. Sorry dude but you arent. See I can argue it because I have used both for at least 2 years. I'll tell you what though, you go get a mac and use it for a small amount of time, say a month and then come back and gimme your arguments because the ones you are giving arent even in the normal scope of reality. I appreciate your conviction but honestly dude, you just dont know and thats the fact. If you don't want a mac then thats fine, it doesnt bother me at all but what bothers me is your debating with unfounded knowledge. basically what you are now saying is that you drove a toyota once and are now telling everyone that you dont like a lexus but you glued a lexus emblem on the hood and therefor it should be a lexus, right? Well no, it doesnt work like that. If you could just run osx on any pc then frickin everyone would be doing it. Hell, look at Dell, Michael Dell has repeatedly say that he'd switch from windows to OSX in a scond if he could. But see Apple is VERY picky about what runs OS X, they dont want it running on a shitty computer because then the whole thing runs shitty and the user experience goes down. You ask why Apples are more $$ and its because they dont use crap to build their computers and are very picky about what goes into them so that they can always keep the minimum user experience at a high level. m$ dont give a shit about user experience so long as they get their $$ from the product, thats where they are different. That is were the ipod rules and its apples basic rule. For your safari problems, then dont use safari, hell I hardly ever use safari, you dont seem to realize that macs have tens of thousands of available programs they can run and most are free and kick the holy living shit outta pc programs. And im not saying you are an Apple hater because obviously it intrigues you but almost everything you say is really quite laughable and wayyyyy off base. All im saying is get on a real mac and use it a week, i mean really use it, find out what it can do and I guarantee you will be saying something totally different. anyways, i can sit here and argue with u or make money and I like money. >Where do you get this 30% thing? It ran just like it was supposed to. It >was responsive, it may have been pirated or leaked, but that doesn't >mean it didn't work correctly. > >I don't understand how the same files would run differently without the >Apple logo on the outside. It ran the apps that it came with fine. The >things that didn't work correctly were things like the version of Safari >with Tiger didn't support Kerberos Authentication, which most of our >applications use to prevent passwords from being sent across the wire. >Safari only allowed for Basic Authentication which sends passwords in >plaintext unless using SSL for the entire site. Safari for 10.4 changed >that so the apps work now for people that paid for the upgrade. > >Everything worked fine, it was a complete functional version of Tiger. >Apple and Intel didn't include any black magic in the hardware. It only >takes a certain level of CPU and chipset and this build would work. > >I never said I didn't have experience, I said that I had a lot of >experience with 8 and 9 in school. We had OSX on a G4 at my last >company. We dual booted 9 and X for testing of apps, I used it fair >amount, but didn't use it for daily tasks because well, we were writing >our apps in .NET. > >You are putting words in my mouth and I don't appreciate it. I've used a >number of things some extensively, others casually. I'm not a complete >Apple hater, I have an iPod, and I think competition is needed in the >environment so that everything gets better. > >Is MS perfect, no, of course not, if they were we'd still be running DOS >1. Is Apple perfect? They keep coming out with new stuff, so clearly >there are things to improve upon. > >I like the way Apple is going. They have finally done away with the >proprietary processor technology and are using an instruction set better >designed for PC tasks. Their big push for home wireless technology was >great. I think I had an airport first because it was cheaper than the >Lucent stuff, but the airport had the same lucent chips on the inside so >I was happy. They have helped the music and video industries to start >pushing technology digitally. > >You put Apple up on this pedestal like they do things different than the >other tech companies. They don't, they use commodity hardware now on the >inside. They don't have some fancy apple only proc designed for this >apple only software like they used to. Adobe drank the Kool-Aid years >ago and stopped working only with Apple on the instruction set. I >remember when Photoshop 4 came out with support for Intel's MMX >technology, that was interesting. It was the point when finally graphics >software was supposed to work on Windows now. If you wanted to do some >photo editing you didn't have to buy a Mac. You could do it all on one >system now. > >With OSX today they advertise the ability to run Windows on your Mac. >They now have made it easy to run their competitors software, but still >won't let their competitor run theirs. I think that is a load of crap, >but I understand why. They need to make money off their hardware sales >because the OS sales alone can't do it. MS has large contracts and >doesn't have any hardware to sell. They don't stop you from running >Vista or XP in boot camp because they get the same amount of money >either way. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dave l [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 11:36 PM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: Re: New MacBook Pro 15! >> >> "So yes, you can get OSX to install on any intel based system. You >just >> have to try." >> on a pirated copy and it still doesnt run anywhere near 100%, maybe >30%, >> ask pearpc about that one and if it did install and work correctly on >any >> pc then everyone would be doing it. >> If you are not running it correctly then how can u assume it doesnt >work? >> Just go back to playing your games because you clearly shouldnt be in >a >> mac debate when you dont have experience on an apple. And earier in a >post >> you said you said you didnt have experience with osx but some friends >of >> yours had os 8 or 9. >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2 Free Trial http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:230898 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
