I think socialism still allows for some private industry and property; it is just heavily regulated by the state. I would think that communism is more geared towards state ownership of property and means of production.
-----Original Message----- From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 3:10 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Quarterly Campaigning Socialism would be state ownership of services. Hillary Clinton supports Universal Healthcare. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 2:41 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Quarterly Campaigning > > I disagree. But ok, let's say it is an issue of definition. How would > you define socalism and how would this apply to her? > > >Yeah, seriously, her plank is as good a description as any. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:54 AM > >To: CF-Community > >Subject: Re: Quarterly Campaigning > > > >And socialism and Hillary's campaign are not the same thing either. > I'm > >not supporting her, but feel a need to point that out. > > > >>Social conscience and socialism aren't the same thing. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJQ Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:231840 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
