I tell you what I would find refreshing, a politician which didn't lie!

I've always found it strange that , to rise the top of the political tree
you have to be sneaky and underhand, but  when they are president/prime
minister we expect them to be angels (and they try to acy like angels)

-----Original Message-----
From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 February 2002 09:38
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style


Or as a little bit of security, in case the came in handy !!

will

-----Original Message-----
From: BethF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 February 2002 19:16
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style


Actually, from my point of view, I think that was propaganda because all the
evidence points to a consensual relationship.  She kept his cum stains
because she was proud of having the relationship with him.

--Beth, Pseudo usenet cop
Merlin MTB, BikeE AT, RANS gliss, Trek R200, Kickbike
Owned by Kavik (Samoyed Boy) and Toklat (Keeshond Boy)
Anchorage, Alaska



----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style


> Don't forget why he was being investigated.  A woman accused him of
> sexual harassment.  The very nature of the alleged crime was sexual in
> nature so the questions in the investigation had to revolve around his
> sexual activity (duh).  The apologists for Clinton always spin it to
> make it sound that he was being investigated for messing around with
> Monica and that it was two consenting adults.  According to Paula Jones,
> she did not consent when Clinton put the moves on her.  That's where it
> all began.  He lied in the beginning and when they conducted their
> investigation found discrepancies in his testimony.  Now they had to go
> back a revisit the issue and figure out who's telling the truth, and on
> and on it went.  It was not about sex, it was about a crime that was
> allegedly committed by one person on another.  You may not believe Paula
> Jones, but I doubt one person on this list would disagree that it should
> not have been investigated.  The investigation regarding that case kept
> ballooning because he kept lying and getting caught in the process.
>
> BTW: Not directed at you Marcus. Your e-mail just happened to be the one
> I responded to.  This was a general response to those who maintain that
> it was sex between two consenting adults when it wasn't.
>
> Michael Corrigan
> Programmer
> Endora Digital Solutions
> 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200
> Lombard, IL 60148
> 630-627-5055 ext.-136
> 630/627-5255 Fax
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Marcus
>   To: CF-Community
>   Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:46 PM
>   Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style
>
>
>   > If its a law thats antiquated and not enforced, then yes it does.
>   >  Have you
>   > seen that list of ridiculous laws that circulates the internet?  If
> I got
>   > arrested for one of those laws then most certainly, I would say I
> had been
>   > wronged.
>
>   Certainly... But those are laws like don't eat an ice cream by the
> lake.
>   Don't wear shorts on Sundays. Laws which make little or no sense at
> all, and
>   would fall apart in any court in the land (although why we haven't
> gotten
>   them off the books is beyond me).
>
>   Mr. Clinton's sexual escapades, while by no means a high crime, were
> in fact
>   illegal, but that's beside my point. If he had stated that his
> personal life
>   was his own, and he would only answer questions pertaining to his job
> as
>   president, I would have still disliked him, but I would have respected
> the
>   privacy of what he did and left it to his family and him to sort out.
>
>   However, when he 'LIED' to investigators, and 'LIED' under oath, he
> changed
>   everything! Like him, if I was caught in an adulterous relationship,
> chances
>   are no criminal charges would be filed against me, and the matter
> would be
>   between my wife and I. But if I lie under oath, and they find out that
> I
>   did... I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts that I go behind bars...
>
>   I also feel that while we are all human, the president needs to be
> held to a
>   higher standard.
>
>   Marcus
>
>
>


______________________________________________________________________
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to