+1 It's very easy to point at a sound-bite that says, "And today the President vetoed a bill that would increase veteran's benefits." That tells us that the President hates our troops and wants to kill our babies...
What they didn't say is that there are riders on the bill that included spending increases on many fronts that the President opposes. Only the first part of the bill included the stuff that was good for vets. The rest increased spending which would lead to eventual increase of taxes and larger government for all. Additionally, there has been a constant push/pull of dollar amounts between Congress and Executive. They (Congress) are constantly trying to increase dollar amounts, thereby defeating the overall goal of lowering spending and thereby allowing for lower taxes. If they didn't pull those shenannigans, Bush would not have had to veto S-Chip. Hatton On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Off the top of my head (not being a mccainite), I'd ask what the riders on > the bill were. That last paragraph shows the adding and subtracting of items > to a bill to make it more or less palatable to one side or another. McCain > may be against the ice cream for all rider on the bill. ;) > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:260625 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
