On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> but no matter). I knew there was a wall. In fact anyone with the ability to
> read and an interest in history could tell you that intelligence services
> (CIA) were specifically supposed to be kept seperate from domestic law
> enforcement (FBI).

Gorelick's wall was built in 1995. The wall prevented them from
tipping each other off about threats. That makes no sense.

> You may or may not remember it, but there was a dude
> named Mccarthy

Yes, he exposed the communists within. Too bad he went too far, being
he was right.

> and then later there was this little thing called Watergate

The wall has nothing to do with Watergate

> bad old days found out that files were being kept on people daring to
> exercise their constitutional rights of dissent and that wiretaps were being
> put in place without warrants and that the government (shockingly) was
> sometimes using its powers for political retribution.

You mean like Kennedy and Clinton did?

> Now I know that that would never happen under a modern Republican
> administration. And I do apologize for being so overly concerned about the
> disappearece of my rights. I'm just a worry wart. I know that the terrorists
> hate us because of our freedoms and I want to actually keep around some of
> those freedoms so they can keep on hating us, ok?

Clinton used illegal wiretaps and putt up a wall that didn't apply to
anyone except him. But you keep thinking it's only the republicans
that take away your rights.

> In my world, the FBI can arrest members of al qaeda cells in the US (that
> whole law enforcement thing) and if they produce information about
> activities outside the US,

The Wall stops this.

> the CIA can go track them down to the ends of the
> earth. In fact, that's how it used to work. But you know that because you're
> a smart guy right?

Not as smart as you think you are :)

> Hahaha..you're such a tool Sam. What part of "string her up for it" did you
> not understand?

This part:
Gorelick would end up being rather a small fish in a big pot.


I'm agreeing with you, she should be smacked around for her
> part in a stupid debacle. So should a whole lot of people that ought to have
> known better but got unconscionably greedy.

Do you mean outright illegal fraud?

> All I said is that she left that
> organization 5 years ago and its just failing now. I dont' agree with what
> she did then, but a whole bunch of other people are to blame for the last 5
> years and from my vantage point, the last 5 years of fuck ups have put the
> previous years fuck ups to shame.

Did you know they're the top economic advisers for Obama?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:269534
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to