On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Judith Dinowitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Michael has never advocated holding all Arabs or Muslems responsible
> for the actions of Hamas, Hizbollah and the terrorists who are
> shooting rockets into Israel. You can't compare Michael and Wright at
> all.

I hope it did not really come across that way. I do not believe that
Michael has ever advocated holding all Arabs or Muslims responsible
for the reprehensible actions of a minority. Nor was I comparing
Michael and Rev. Wright.

Rather I was trying to invoke a sense of understanding. I deplore the
Us vs. Them mentality that permeates the Isreal/Palestine clash. But
it is understandable. The people of Isreal have suffered at the hands
of Palenstinians and their allies. Palestinians have suffered at the
hands of Isreal and their allies. I don't necessarily agree with
either of them because the situation is complicated and frustrated.
None-the-less, I can understand the anger on both sides.

That is what I was trying to invoke as a path of understanding. I
think that Rev. Wright has righteous anger at the centuries of
oppression that have been visited upon his people. He has current
examples of transgressions being visited upon his people to this day.
I don't agree with all the ways he reacts to those issues but it is
wrong to deny those issues and I think it is unfair to deny his anger
even if you disagree with his expression of it.

My point is that people who have a keen understanding of oppression
come about it in a variety of ways. Rev. Wright seems to have settled
into a confrontational, us versus them, attitude. Obama, from what I
have seen, has transcended that and developed a more inclusive way of
approaching the subject and it is likely to yield more results.

But we all have to start our growth and understanding somewhere. I
think that Michael has a visceral connection with the plight of people
he considers brothers worldwide, through his deep feelings for
Judaism. The Rev. Wright has established a similar connection with a
diverse group of people, but with a common bond, hence the notion of
Black Liberation Theology. I think that the Rev. Wright is
short-sighted and that his fear, anger and distrust has kept him from
achieving his goals. So people like Barack Obama have taken their
lessons from the old guard and moved beyond them, becoming more
inclusive and trying to achieve a goal of equality and justice without
the violent rhetoric of old.

Fundamentally, I'd like to think that jewish folk could understand the
anger that might come about from centuries of oppression and see that
there are elders that you can admire while disagreeing with and move
beyond them into a new way of understanding your relationship with the
world.

Judah

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:276798
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to