If there is no bias in the media, how can ther be another 'side' of the story?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The other side of the story: > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html?_r=1&oref=slogin > > http://tinyurl.com/6eayuo > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bullshit, this is totally about free speech. Ex-soldiers were given > > briefings so they could go on the air and talk about the war, get their > > facts straight, and provide good analysis. None of that was hidden, I > > remember quite distinctly that several of these guys mentioned on air > having > > been at briefings at the Pentagon. Furthermore, McInerney said the > > information he was provided was the same information provided to the > media, > > and there is no indication that anything secret was ever leaked. > > > > This investigation is the Democratic Party trying to silence dissenting > > voices, plain and simple. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:277603 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
