I never said there was no bias in the media. Most stories have three sides, the left, the right and the truth.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If there is no bias in the media, how can ther be another 'side' of the > story? > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The other side of the story: >> >> >> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/20generals.html?_r=1&oref=slogin >> >> http://tinyurl.com/6eayuo >> >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Bullshit, this is totally about free speech. Ex-soldiers were given >> > briefings so they could go on the air and talk about the war, get their >> > facts straight, and provide good analysis. None of that was hidden, I >> > remember quite distinctly that several of these guys mentioned on air >> having >> > been at briefings at the Pentagon. Furthermore, McInerney said the >> > information he was provided was the same information provided to the >> media, >> > and there is no indication that anything secret was ever leaked. >> > >> > This investigation is the Democratic Party trying to silence dissenting >> > voices, plain and simple. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:277649 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
