Yeah, my excitement got ahead of my reading and comprehension. I thought you were taking the sentence
"How many of your pet conservatives advocated the same?" and throwing it back on him as "none of your so called liberals advocated" rewriting the same thing as negatives, to show a point. Which is a valid and useful argument technique, to show unfairness. (if the same thing in reverse doesnt feel right, it might not be right) But I thought you had missed the "pet conservative" part. Which to me does change the meaning of that sentence. And was wondering if you missed it by reading fast, or if that part meant something different to you, or if you purposefully skipped it. Was wondering if existing thoughts, or argument trends, or who is saying something, or preconceived notions affected reading comprehension and therefore shaped your thoughts on it. Good exciting idea for me, wrong application. On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Accusation or not... you attributed text to me that I did not type. > As far as "do people really believe it?"... some of them do, yes. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:279044 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
