i read the "none of your so called liberals" as meaning no liberal. none of. and bear in mind, as I've stated, history plays heavily into my interpretation. And it's really not fair (or accurate) to suggest or imply that it's only with one person. I've felt like there has been a constant and ongoing barrage of "left good / right bad" posts over the past few months.
The "pet conservative" part was not part of the post that prompted me to give Bruce the thumbs up. It was the "none of" part. On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > laziness. which is a curse. > > so "none of your so called liberals" and "pet conservative". > > What was the "set" of people you read those as? > > > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Charlie Griefer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > When he said "your so called liberals" and "pet conservatives", I read > > > "talking heads and politicians". What did you read those as? > > > > > > > You left out a word. "none" (well, two words... "none of"). To me, that > > puts the quote in a different context. Did you mistype or did you do > that > > to deliberately twist Larry's words to support your argument? > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:279086 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
