Actually, Southern Baptist celebrate a Eucharistic sacrament. It isn't common, but they do celebrate one.
===== Russel Madere Senior Software Engineer Turbo Squid, Inc. http://www.turbosquid.com Is your head tag nested within your body tag? > -----Original Message----- > From: Garza, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 12:25 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Circumcision article link > > > To my knowledge, the only two Christian faiths that take communion as a > Sacrament, and those are the Episcopals and the Catholics. While all > Christian faiths are founded on the birth, death and > resurrection of Jesus > Christ, as well as many aspects of the Old Testament, not all follow the > same sacramental chain. > > Jeff Garza > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:15 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Circumcision article link > > > It's not a question of welcome but of existence. When exposed to > a religious > symbol a vampire flees or dies. Some legends say that it has to > be held by a > believer in the symbol. Mass is full of symbols held by believers. Taking > communion is taking a symbol into the body. instant death. > > At 12:58 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: > >Nit Picking here... You are talking about Catholic Vampires (maybe > >Episcopalian as well). There are plenty of "Christian" religions that > >would probably welcome vampires.... <G> > > > >Jeff Garza > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:52 AM > >To: CF-Community > >Subject: RE: Circumcision article link > > > > > >You know me, always researching the practical applications. :) Of > >course, by definition a religious Christian vampire can't exist either. > >Taking communion or going to mass (requirements) would kill it > >automatically. > > > >At 12:39 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: > >>I'm glad you explained that, I didn't want to stick my neck out on > >>that > >>issue. > >>;-) > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:42 AM > >>> To: CF-Community > >>> Subject: RE: Circumcision article link > >>> > >>> > >>> No Jewish vampires either. > >>> Yes, one can eat non-Kosher is their life depends on it but > >>> vampires are by definition not alive so their life can't > >>> depend on it. i.e. a vampire who's Jewish and religious has to starve. > >>> > >>> At 12:31 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: > >>> >Gee, somehow I knew the Masai weren't Jewish > >>> >;-) > >>> > > >>> > > >>> >> -----Original Message----- > >>> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>> >> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:31 AM > >>> >> To: CF-Community > >>> >> Subject: RE: Circumcision article link > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> At 12:19 PM 4/12/02, you wrote: > >>> >> >thanks, not eating pork is always something i've wondered about. > >>> >> > > >>> >> >whats the exact religious reason? > >>> >> Laws of ritual purity when dealing with what you eat. Land > >>> >> animals have to have split hooves and chew their cud. Sea animals > >>> >> have to have fins and scales. Birds of prey (depending on claw > >>> >> configuration) are not allowed. Those are the basics. Also, blood > >>> >> is not allowed. > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >-----Original Message----- > >>> >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>> >> >Sent: 12 April 2002 16:52 > >>> >> >To: CF-Community > >>> >> >Subject: RE: Circumcision article link > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> >Pig is one of the animals specifically mentioned as being > >>> >> not allowed. Even > >>> >> >when I wasn't religious I didn't eat it (and I was just a > >>> >> kid). Closest I've > >>> >> >come is soy bacon. salty, but I love it. :) > >>> >> > > >>> >> >At 11:39 AM 4/12/02, you wrote: > >>> >> >>so as far as your concerned it's a commandment not to eat pork? > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >>-----Original Message----- > >>> >> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>> >> >>Sent: 12 April 2002 16:40 > >>> >> >>To: CF-Community > >>> >> >>Subject: Re: Circumcision article link > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >>Actually, a religious person (at least this one) looks at > >>> >> it and says that > >>> >> >>its a commandment and I'm doing it because its a > >>> >> commandment. If science > >>> >> >>says that the commandment has a physical effect, then fine > >>> >> and good. The > >>> >> >>physical effect is totally secondary to the spiritual effect. > >>> >> >>To > >>> >> >>say that the commandment or every commandment was done > >>> >> for a physical > >>> >> >>reason such as health opens the door to denial of the root of > >>> >> >>the commandment. Hey, not eating pork was because of > >>> >> trichinosis. If we cook it > >>> >> >>right then we wouldn't get the disease and we can now eat > >>> >> it. Same for all > >>> >> >>the other commandments. This is the rational of the reform > >>> >> movement and a > >>> >> >>rational rejected by religious Jews. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >>At 03:51 AM 4/12/02, you wrote: > >>> >> >>>It seems that much of the old testament law, such as > >>> >> circumcision, what to > >>> >> >>eat and not to eat, etc., has a good basis in what is > >>> >> healthy, especailly > >>> >> >>given the lack of sanitary conditions of the times. > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>>A religious person might argue that this is God making up > >>> >> the lack of > >>> >> >>science of the time to protect people. A non-believer might > >>> >> argue that this > >>> >> >>is wise people coming up religious law to mirror their own > >>> >> observations > >>> >> >>about what makes a person sick. Either way, it > >>> >> demonstrates a good deal of > >>> >> >>wisdom in the old books. > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>>H. > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>>---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > >>> >> >>>from: "Braver, Ben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> >> >>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> >> >>>date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 19:56:23 -0700 > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >>>>Found a link to the original article on circumcision & > >>> >> risk of cervical > >>> >> >>>>cancer - it's in the New England Journal of Medicine: > >>> >> >>>>http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/346/15/1105 > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>>Apparently, the foreskin is particularly susceptible to > >>> >> infection from > >>> >> >HPV > >>> >> >>- > >>> >> >>>>human papilloma virus - which is linked to cervical cancer. > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>>>-Ben > >>> >> >>>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > >> > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
